The Response of two Wheat Cultivars Triticumspp to Cytokinin and Water Stress Treatments and their Interactions

Faisal- Abdlkadir Sakri, & Shireen- AbdulKerim Amin

1 Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, 2 College of Science, Salahaddin University

This research had been conducted to investigate the response of two wheat cultivars to cytokinin and
droughtness treatments through plant height, number of tillers per plant, flag leaf length, number of
kernel per spike, weight of 100 kernels, protein, and total carbohydrates content of kernels. The maximum
mean value for plant height was recorded for Sham-3 cultivar at 80 ppm which is significantly increased
as compare to control, while the flag leaf length increased nonsignificantly at 40 ppm. Treatments with
40 and 80 ppm significantly decrease weight of 100 kernels for Mexipak cultivar, while in Sham-3
cytokinin at all concentrations significantly decreased weight of 100 kernels. It is obvious that cytokinin
treatments with drought plants was less affective compared with normal irrigation with regard to
carbohydrate content for Mexipak cultivars. In Sham-3, the results showed that the carbohydrate
percentage in all cytokinin treated plants whether, drought or irrigated, were decreased significantly,
while the weight of 100 kernels has not been changed in CK3D compare to the CK0N but increased
significantly when compared with CK0D.

Keywords: Various wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), (Triticum durum L.), cytokinin,


1.  Mujtaba, S. M. and Alam, S. M. Drought phenomena and crop growth. Pakistans Leading  Business Magazine, 2002. 2:1-4.

2.  Vanstaden, J. and Davey, J. E. The synthesis, transport, and metabolism of endogenous   Cytokinin. Plant Cell and Environment 1979,2:93-106.

3.  Herbst, S. T., The Food Lovers Companion, 2nd edition1998, Barron's Educational Services, Inc.

4.  Cigiar .. Priorities and Strategies for Resource Allocation during April. 1997.

5.  Wilson, R. Recognizing water stress in plants. The Arboretum at Flagstaff Extension Bulletin, BIOS Scientific Publishers. 2007. 91-101.

6.  Bartels, D. and Sunkar, S. Drought and salt tolerance in plant. Critical Reviews in nPlant   Sciences, 2005.24: 23-58.

7.  Kaminek, M.; Motyka, V.; and Vaňkovā, R. Regulation of cytokinin content in plant  cells. Physiol. Plant. 1997.101: 689-700.

8.  Li, A. G. Hou., Y. S. Wall, G. W. Trent, A. Kimball, B. A. and Printer, J. R. Free-air  CO2      enrichment and drought stress effects on grain filling rate and duration in  spring wheat. Crop   Science. 2000, 40:1263-1270.

9.  Kaminek, M., M. Tračkova, A. Gaudinova, P. Dobrer, V. Motyka, J. Albrechtova, and O.                 Votrbova. Regulation of CKs and auxin levels in developing wheat grains and it is use for      crop improvement. The Grant Agency of the Czech Republic. 2002.2: 41-45.

10.    Trćkova, M. and M. Kaminek. Effect of exogenous CKs on nitrate uptake and nitrogen assimilation in wheat plants. Research institute of crop production, Drnovska. 2002. 2:34-39.

11.    Banowetz, G. M. Cultivars of hexaploid wheat contrasting stature and chlorophyll retention differ in CKs content and responsiveness. Annals of Botany. 1997. 79:185190.

12.    McClare, J. T. and Sincich, T. A first course in statistics. 7th edition. Printed Hall Inc.USA. 2000. 33-45.

13.    Shalfer, P. A. and Hartman, A. F. The iodometric determination of cupper and it is use in sugar analysis (Modified by Noakell, E. J. and El-Gawadi, A., Barnell): New Phytol 1921.35: 229 -266.

14.    Coombs, J. G., Hind, R. C., Lee good, L. L., Tieszen and A. Vonshak. Analytical techniques. From techniques in biodiversity and photosynthesis. 2nd edition Pergamon Press. New York. 1985. 56-67.

15.    AL-Delaimy, K. S. Protein and amino acid composition of Truffle. J. Inst. Can. Sci. Technol. Aliment. 1977. 10(3).

16.    Sakri, F. A, Ghafour, N. H. and Amin, S. A Responses of various wheat (Triticum  spp.)To water status. Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani, . 2005. 8 (1) partA: 85-97.    

17.    Mohr, H. and Peter, S.. Plant Physiology. Spriger-Verlag Berlin Heidelburge.   NewYork1995

18.    Hare, P. D.; Cress, W. A. and Van Staden, J. The involvement of cytokinins in plant             responses to environmental stress- Plant growth Regulation. 1997. 23: 79-103.

19.    Finkelstein, R. R.; Gampala, S. S. l.; and Rock, C. D. Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell 2002. 14, 15-45.

20.    Dupont, F. M.; and Altenbach, S. B. Molecular and biochemical impacts of environmental factors on wheat grain development and protein synthesis. Journal of cereal science, 2003, 38:133-146.

21.    Mckersie, B. D. and Y. Y. Leshem. Stress and stress coping in cultivated plants. Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1994, 27.

22.    Cornic, G. and J. M. Briantais. Partitioning of photosynthetic electron flow between CO2 and O2 reduction in a C3 leaf (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at different CO2 concentrations and during drought stress. Planta, 1991,183: 178-184.

23.    Ute Schuppler, He. P. H.; John, P. L. L.; and Munns, R. Effect of water stress on cell division and cell-division-cycle 2-like cell-cycle kinase activity in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol,        1998,117: 667-678.

24.    Bohnert, H. J., Nelsen, D. E. and Jonsen, R. G. Adaptation to environmental stress. The  Plant 1995.Cell 7:1099-1111.

25.    Taiz, L.; and Zeiger, E. 1998, Plant Physiology. 2nd edition. Sinauuer Associates, INC., Publishers.p.625-634.

26.    Banowetz, G. M. Post anthesis high temperature reduces CKs accumulation in wheat grains. Plant, Cell, and Environment. 1998, 22(3): 309-316.