Comparative Productive Performance of Local Hens in Erbil- Kurdistan Region


1 Kamaran A. Abas, 2 Hani N. Hermiz, 2 Tahir R. Al-Khatib, 3 Shayma M. Amin, 4 Aram M. Ahmed, 5 Dastan A. Hamad
1,2 Department of Animal Resource, College of Agriculture, Salahaddin University, 3,4,5 Department of Animal Production, Director of Agricultural Research and Extension - Erbil




Abstract:
This experiment was conducted to study the effect of age at production and different
genetic phenotypes of local hens in Erbil. Birds of each genotype were kept in family pens
depended on their colours (Line 1 = Black with Brown Neck, Line 2 = Isa Brown, Line 3 =
Spotty, Line 4= Pure Black) were randomly distributed on two replicates compared with a
commercial strain (Isa brown). Performance characteristics were evaluated. Results showed
that age at production and genetic phenotype were affected significantly (P<0.05) on some
performance traits. Significant differences between groups were found in Egg Production,
Egg Mass, Feed Intake and Feed Conversion Ratio traits. Insignificant differences were
found between groups in Egg Weight. Age of production affected insignificantly on Feed
Intake, while affected significantly (P<0.05) on other traits. It is concluded that selection
might be possible in local hens to improve their genetic potentials in Iraq-Kurdistan region.

Keywords: Local hens; Egg production; egg weight; egg mass; feed intake; feed conversion
ratio



References

[1] D. J. Alexander, J. G. Bell and R. G. Alders “Technology Review: Newcastle with special
emphasis on its effect on village chickens”, FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. 161.
Rome, FAO. pp 63, (2004).
[2] R. G. Alders and Pym RAE “Village poultry: Still important to millions, eight thousand years
after domestication”, WPS J. 6, pp 181-190, (2009).
[3] C. C. Kekeocha, “Poultry Production Handbook”, Macmillan Publishers Ltd., London, UK,
(1985)
[4] S. M. E. Ershad, “Performance pf hybrid layers and native hens under farmers’ management
in a selected area of bangladesh”, International J. Poult. Sci. 4, pp 228-232, (2005)
[5] N. H. Casey Garcês, and P. Horst. “Productive performance of naked neck, frizzle and dwarf
laying hens under various natural climates and two nutritional treatments”, South African J.
Anim. Sci. 31, pp 174-180, (2001).
[6] P.K. Mathur and P. Horst, “Temperature stress and tropical locations as factors for genotype x
environment interactions in poultry production. Proc. Genotype x environment interactions in
poultry production”, Jouy-en-Josas (France), Ed. INRA, pp 83-96 (1989).
[7] SAS. “SAS/STAT User's Guide for personal computers”. Release, 8.2. SAS Institute, Inc.,
Cary, NC, USA, (2005).
[8] D.B. Duncan “multiple ranges and multiple test biometrics” 11, pp 1-42, (1955).
[9] Y. k.M. Afifi, O. M. Aly and Nazla Y. Abou El-Ella, “Effect of crossing on the performance
of local chicken strains: Effect of strain and laying age on egg quality characteristics” Egypt
Poult. Sci. J. 30, pp 1171-1188, (2010).
[10] Dakpogan, Hervé Brice; Sahidou Salifou, Armand B. Gbangboche and Christophe A.A.M.
Chrysostome, “Laying performance of five local hen phenotypes, in improved rearing
conditions”, J. Animal and Plant Sci. 15, pp 2130-2134, (2012).