The Behaviour of Confined Granular soil loaded by a square footing


Dhiaadin Bahaadin Noori Zangana

Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sulaimani – Kurdistan Region



Abstract
This research involves the behaviour of confined granular soil supported by a
square footing. A series of bearing capacity tests were carried out on a small-scale
laboratory model, which filled with sand, placed in a dense state and confined with
UPVC cell. The response of an unconfined state was measured in the beginning,
and then compared with the confined sand. The studied variables included the
cylinder height and diameter, the depth of the footing to the top of the cylinder and
the embedded depth of the footing.
The test results indicated that the soil confinement resists lateral displacement of
sand underneath the footing, which is leading to a significant improvement for the
response of the footing. The curves of load-settlement generally showed the same
trend in all the cases. Failure was considered as a settlement, which was equal to
8% of the total footing width. Also, the recommended optimum cell height,
diameter, footing depth to the top of the cylinder and the embedded depth of
footing that give the maximum bearing capacity improvement were presented and
discussed. According to the present research results, a conclusion based on the soil
confinement role and found to be notably increased the bearing capacity and
stiffness. Furthermore, a modification of load–settlement behaviour of the sub
grade sand was also gained.
 

Key Words: Square Footing, Bearing Capacity, Load-Settlement Behaviour, Granular Soil, Confinement 



REFERENCES

1. Rajagopal, K., Krishanaswamy, N., and Latha, G. ~1999. “Behaviour of sand confined with single and
multiple geocells.” Geotext. Geomembr., 17, 171–184.
2. Binquet, J., and Lee, K. L. 1975. “Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div.
10112, 1241–1255.

3. Fragaszy, R. J., and Lawton, E. 1984, “Bearing capacity of reinforced sand subgrades.” J. Geotech. Eng.,
11011, 1500–1507.
4. Guido, V. A., Chang, D. K., and Sweeney, M. A. ~1986!. “Comparison of geogrid and geotextile
reinforced earth slabs.” Can. Geotech. J., 23, 435–440.
5. Mahmoud, M. A., and Abdrabbo, F. M. 1989. “Bearing capacity tests on strip footing on reinforced sand
subgrade.” Can. Geotech. J., 26, 154–159.
6. Khing, K. H., Das, B. M., Puri, V. K., Cook, E. E., and Yen, S. C. 1993. “The bearing capacity of a strip
foundation on geogrid reinforced sand.” Geotext. Geomembr, 12, 351–361.
7. Mandal, J. M., and Manjunath, V. R. 1995. “Bearing capacity of strip footing resting on reinforced sand
subgrades.” Constr. Build. Mater. 9-11, 35–38.
8. Das, B. M., and Omar, M. T. 1994. “The effects of foundation width on model tests for the bearing
capacity of sand with geogrid reinforcement.” Geotech. Geologic. Eng., 12, 133–141.
9. Das, B. M., Puri, V. K., Omar, M. T., and Evgin, E. 1996. “Bearing capacity of strip foundation on
geogrid reinforced sand-scale effects in model tests.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Offshore and Polar
Engineering, Vol. I, 527–530.
10. Dash, S., Krishnaswamy, N., and Rajagopal, K. 2001a. “Bearing capacity of strip footing supported on
geocell-reinforced sand.” Geotext. Geomembr., 19, 235–256.
11. Dash, S., Rajagopal, K., and Krishnaswamy, N. 2001b!. “Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds
with additional planar reinforcement.” Geotext. Geomembr., 19, 529–538.
12. BSI -1377 (1975), “Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes”, Inst. of civil Engg.,London.
13. Kolbuszewki, J.J. (1984), “An Experimental Study of Maximum and Minimum Porosities of Sands”,
Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Engg, Rotterdam, Vol. 1, pp. 158-165.
14. Vesic, A.S. (1973) “Analysis of Ultimate Loads of Shallow Foundations”, Journal of Soil Mechanics
and Foundation Division, Vol. 99(1), 45-73
15. Omar, M. T., Das, B. M., Puri, V. K., and Yen, S. C. ~1993a!. “Ultimate bearing capacity of shallow
foundations on sand with geogrid reinforcement.” Can. Geotech. J., 30, 545–549.
16. Omar, M. T., Das, B. M., Yen, S. C., Puri, V. K., and Cook, E. E. ~1993b. “Ultimate bearing capacity of
rectangular foundations on geogrid reinforced sand.” Geotech. Test. J., 16, 246–252.