Role of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis


Hiwa O. Ahmed1, Tahir Arif2, & Alla Abdulkadir Shalli2

College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, 2 Sulaimani Technical Institute, Kurdistan Region/Iraq





Abstract
In this work the authors have tried a prospective study over 5 years to evaluate the role of ultrasound,
in non selected groups of patients with lower abdominal pain & suspicion of acute appendicitis, all the
ultrasound examinations done by two ultrasonographists.
Although ultrasound is a simple, cost-effective, non-invasive investigation with high acceptance by the
patients, clinical examination remains a cornerstone of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and it is
superior to ultrasound examination in diagnosis of cases of acute appendicitis.

Keywords : Acute appendicitis, Ultrasound.



References

I. Amgwerd, M; Rothlin, M et al, Ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis by surgeons- a matter of experience? A prospective study, Langnbecks — Arch — Chir, 1994, 
2. Wong-ML: Caseyso, Leonidas-JC et al, Sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children, J- Pediatr-Surg 1994, 29(10) , 1356-60.
3. Nesterenko-IuA;Grinberg-AA, et al, US diagnosis of acute appendicitis, Khirurgiia-Mosk,1994, 17(7), 26-9.
4. Zielke-A, Malewski-U et al, Us diagnosis in suspected AA: probable or certain indications for surgery? , Chirurg 1991, 62(10), 743-9.
5. Beyer-D;Shulte-B et al, Sonograghy of acute appendicitis , A 5-year *prospective study of 2074 patients , Radiology 1993,33(7) , 399-406.
6. Moenne — K;Fernandez- Metal, Utility of high resonance US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, Rev-Med-Chi1 1992, 12002), 1383(7).
7. Zeki-AM; MacMahon RA;Gray-AR, Acute appendicitis in Children: When does US -IV-Z-J- surg 1994, 6400) , 6958.
8. Wade-DS: Marrow SE et al, Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon's clinical impression; Arch —Surg, 1993, 128(9), 1039-46.
9. Puskar-D,Bedalov-G et al , Urinalysis , US analysis and renal dynamic scintigraphy in acute appendicitis ,Uroloo , 1995, 45(1) , 108-12.
10. Reisener-KP: Tittle —AN et al, Value of sonography in routine diagnosis of acute appendicitis retrospective analysis, Leber-Magen — Darm, 1994, 24(1), 19-22.
11. Ford —Rd: Passinault —WJ- Morse- ME, Diagnostic ultrasound for suspected appendicitis; does the added cost produce a better outcome? , Am-Surg , 1994, 60(11), 895-8.
12. David Sutton, Textbook of Radiology & Imaging, 7th Edition 2003Elniseter science Ltd. London ,.Page 683-684
13. Peter Armstrong & Martin Lewisite, A concise textbook of Radiology ,first Edition, 2001,Arnold, London Page 103-104.
14. Tarjan —Z, Mako —E et al, The value of ultrasonic diagnosis in acute appendicitis, Orv-Hetil, 1995, 2,136(4), 713-7.
15. Niebuhr-H et al, Routine ultrasound in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, Zentralbl -Chir, 1998, 123 (4), 26-8.
16. Dreuw-B-Truong-S et al: The value of sonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. A prospective study of 100 patients, Chirurg: 1990, 61 (12), 880-6.
17. Goudet —P, Michelin —T et al, Practical role of ultrasound and clinical examination for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, Prospective study, Gastroenterol —Clin —biol 1991, 14(11), 812-6.
18. Crady-SK, Jones-JS et al, Clinical validity of ultrasound in children with suspected appendicitis, Ann-Emergmed, 1993, 22(7), and 1125-9.
19. Chesbrough -RM et al, Self— localization in US of appendicitis: as addition to graded compression, Radiology, 1993, 187(2), 349-51.
20. Paul Carter, The acute abdomen & its management, Hospital Medicine, 2000, 61, 10.
21. Malcolm J D, Failure to consider that the woman with the acute abdomen might be pregnant has been a common feature in deaths from ectopic pregnancy. Hospital medicine 2001, 62, 3, 182.