The Role of Various out Patients Aural Toileting Procedures in the Treatment of Otomycosis

Authors

  • Yousif Ebrahim Chalabi College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Author
  • Sarwat Tawfeq San-Ahmed Sulaimani Teaching Hospital, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17656/jzs.10209

Keywords:

Otomycosis, Ear syringing, Dry suction cleansing, Anterior metal recess toilet (AMR)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Otomycosis is not uncommon clinical problem requiring a long term treatment and has a recurrence tendency. Meticulous cleansing especially of anterior metal recess is the treatment mainstay. OBJECTIVES; to determine the clinical presentation and predisposing factors, compare the efficacy of aural toileting procedures and to assess the syringing role as a safe effective procedure for deep meatal recess debris removal. METHOD: A randomized prospective comparative study conducted on 91 patients (99 ears) in ENT consultation clinic- Sulaimani Teaching Hospital from April 2007 – November 2008. Patients were divided into two groups :group A underwent ear syringing and group B underwent dry suction cleansing. Data entry and analysis by software version 15 (2008) carried out (STATGRAPHICS) RESULTS: presenting symptoms were otalgia (94.5%), ear fullness (74.72%), itching (58.24%), hearing impairment (40.65%), otorrhea (20.87%) and headache (14.82%). Predisposing factors were ear moisture (94.5%), self cleansing habit (62.63%), ototopical agent overuse (36.26%) and dermatophytosis (19.78%). Dry cleaning showed complete debris removal in 31(63.26%) ears and incomplete removal in 18 (36.73%) ears while syringing showed complete removal in 38 (76%) ears and incomplete removal in 12 (24%) ears. Dry cleaning adverse effect was 37.37% compared to 12.12% in wet group. CONCLUSIONS; There was insignificant static differences (Chi-Squared p=0.3411) between the two regimens and both can be used for treatment. However, clinically gentle ear syringing is less time consuming, Less complicated and more meticulous in deep recess cleaning.

References

Emmons CW, Binford CH, Kwon Chung KJ. Medical mycology. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 3rd ed.1997, 483-484

Roland. Ruthka: Topical antifungals, Ototoxicity- BC Decker Inc, Hamilton-London 2006,134-136.

Lucente FE. Fungal infections of the external ear. Otolaryngology Clinic North Am, 1993, 26,995-1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6665(20)30741-6

Rowlands S. Devalia H ,Smith et al Otitis Externa in UK general practice, survey using the UK GP Research Database; Br. J Gen pract. 2005, 51(468),533-8.

Stern JC, Shah MK, Lucente FE. In vitro effectiveness of 13 agents in otomycosis and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 1988, 98,1173-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198811000-00005

Selesnick SH. Otitis Externa: management of recalcitrant case. Am J otol, 1994; 15(3),408-412

Beaney GPE, Broughton A. Tropical otomycosis. J Laryngeal Otol ,1967, 81,987-97

Tang Ho, Jeffrey T. Vrabec, Donald Yoo, and Newton J. Coker, Otomycosis: Clinical features and treatment Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery ,2006,35,787-791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.07.008

Lee K.J. : Essential Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 8th Edition,2003,470-2.

Lawrence W.C. Tom MD, Lisa Elden M., and Roger R. Marsh, Topical Antifungals BC Decker Inc Printed in Canada, 2004 ,134-6

Maran A.G.D, Logan Turners Disease of the Nose, Throat and Ear.10th Ed.1988, 270-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198808000-00024

Ben L. Briant, A Therapy of proved efficacy in Otomycosis Los Angles ,1948,68 (5)

,359-61

Eekhof JAH, De Bock GH, Le Cressie S, Springer MP.A quasi-randomized trial of water as a quick softening agent of persistent earwax in general pratice. BrJ Gen Pract 2005,51,635-637.

Mcburney R, Searcy Hb. Otomycosis: investigation of effective fungicidal agents in treatment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1936, 45,988-1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348943604500406

Andreas Schapowal: Otitis Externa: a clinical review. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal; August 2002, 81, 8. (ProQuest medical library).

Mugliston T,O Donoghue G. Otomycosis-a continuing problem. J Laryngol Otol 1985, 99,327-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002221510009678X

Zélia Braz Vieira da Silva Pontes et al. Otomycosis: a retrospective Study. Brazilian Journal of otorhinolaryngology ,2009,75(3),367-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30653-4

Stern JC, Lucente FE. Otomycosis. Ear. Nose. Throat J 1988,67,804-10.

Harold Ludman. Discharge from the ear: otitis externa and acute otitis mdia.Br Med J ,1980,281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.281.6255.1616

ChowV.T.K.;B.HO; HongG. S.; T. C. Liu. The Journal of Hygiene, 1986,97(2),385-392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022172400065475

Loh KS, Tan KK, Kumarasinghe G, Leong HK, Yeoh KHOtitis externa-the clinical pattern in tertiary institution in singapore. Ann Acad Med singapore 1998,27;215-218.

Cohen et al (otitic candidiasis in children: an evaluation of the problem. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol,1990,99,427-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949009900602

Schuster E.. Dunn-Coleman N.. Frisvad J.C. P.W.M van Dijck: On the safety of Aspergllus niger-areview © Singapore-Verlag ,2002.

Kumatowski P, Filipiak A, Otomycosis: prevalence, clinical symptoms, therapeutic procedure. Mycoses ,2001,44 (11-12),472-79.

Raymundo Munguia , Sam J. Daniel. Ototopical antifungals and otomycosis: a review. International journal of pediatric otolaryngology ,2008,72,453-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.12.005

Joy MJ, Agarwal MK, Samant HC,et al. Mycological and bacteriological studies in otomycosis. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology ,1980,32,72-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03047588

Geaney GP. Tropical otomycosis. J Larynggol Otol ,1967,81,987-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100067955

Sree Rama Rao K, Manjaneyulu p. Otomycosis. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology, 1979,31,65-8. reported by others. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02992236

William B Hurst,outcome of 22 cases of TM perforation caused by otomycosis. The journal of Laryngology and Otology nov, 2005, 115,879-880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215011909486

Pradhan B, Tuladhar NR, Amatya RM. Prevalence of otomycosis in OPD of

Otolaryngology in Tribhuvan University Teaching hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Ann OtolRhinol Laryngol ,2006,112 (4),384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940311200416

Richard Shikiar, Michral T.Halpern, Mary McGann, Cynthia. S.Palmerand Mindell Seidlin .The relation of patient satisfaction with treatment of otitis externa to clinical outcomes: Development of an instrument Clinical Therapeutics ,1999,21(6),1091-1104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(99)80027-7

Ford ES Ford ES, Mokdad AH, and Giles WH, et al. Otomycosis: prevalence, clinical symptoms, therapeutic procedure .Mycoses ,2006,44,472-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0507.2001.00689.x

Freeman RB. Impacted cerumen: How to safely remove earwax in an office visit. Geriatric ,1995,50,52-3.

Sharp JF, Wilson JA, Ross L, et al. Ear wax removal: A survey of current practice.Br Med J ,1990,301,1251-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.301.6763.1251

Published

2010-06-26

How to Cite

The Role of Various out Patients Aural Toileting Procedures in the Treatment of Otomycosis. (2010). Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani - Part A, 13(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.17656/jzs.10209

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>