Calculation and Analysis of Mean Glandular Dose During a Mammogram

Authors

  • Dastan Khalid Department of Physics, School of Science Education, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17656/jzs.10299

Keywords:

Mean Glandular Dose (MGD), Mammography, Radiation Dose in Mammograhy

Abstract

Mammographic density is the difference in appearance of glandular to fatty tissue in a mammogram. Investigation in doses delivered in mammography is carried out. The Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) is calculated and compared to the standard values. The results show the value of MGD is comparable to some of the references, however there are very large variations in MGD and mAs with respect to specific Compressed Breast Thickness and percent glandularity. The results suggest a lack of understanding of radiation uses and the risks that are involved in x-ray induced breast cancer in Sulaimani hospitals especially the Mammography Centre.

References

BoydN. F. Dite G. S. Stone J. Gunasekara A. English D. R. McCredie M. R. E. Giles

G. G. Tritchler D. Chiarelli A. Yaffe M. J. and Hopper J. L. “Heritability of

Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 347,

no. 12, pp. 886–894, Sep. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc956

Boyd N. F. Guo H. Martin L. Sun L. Stone J. Fishell E. Jong R. Hislop G. Chiarelli A.

Minkin S. and Yaffe M. “2007 Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of

Breast Cancer,” N Engl J Med, vol. 356, no. 3, pp. 227 – 36, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa062790

Brock A. Krause S. Li H. Kowalski M. Goldberg M. S. Collins J. J. and Ingber D. E.

“Silencing HoxA1 by Intraductal Injection of siRNA Lipidoid Nanoparticles Prevents

Mammary Tumor Progression in Mice,” Sci. Transl. Med. , vol. 6 , no. 217 , pp.

ra2–217ra2, Jan. 2014.

Byrne C. and Spernak S. “What is breast density?,” Breast Cancer Online, vol. 8, no. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470903105003093

, p. null–null, 2005.

Dance D. R. Skinner C. L. Young K. C. Beckett J. R. and Kotre C. J. “Additional

factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography

dosimetry protocol,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 45, pp. 3225 – 3240, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308

Dance D. R. Young K. C. and van Engen R. E. “Further factors for the estimation of

mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom , European and IAEA breast dosimetry

protocols,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 54, pp. 4361 – 4372, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/002

Dance D. R. “Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean

glandular breast dose,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1211 – 1219, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/002

Dance D. R. Skinner C. L. and Alm Carlsson G. “Breast dosimetry,” Appl. Radiat.

Isot., vol. 50, pp. 185–203, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00047-5

Egan R. and Mosteller R. “Breast cancer mammography patterns.,” Cancer, vol. 40, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197711)40:5<2087::AID-CNCR2820400516>3.0.CO;2-3

no. 5, pp. 2087 – 2090, 1977.

Khalid D. “Development of breast density measurement technique for cancer

screening,” University College London, 2010.

Klein R. Aichinger H. Dierker J. Jansen J. T. M. Joite-Barfub S. Sabel M. Schulz-

Wendtland R. and Zoetelief J. “Determination of average glandular dose with modern

mammography units for two large groups of patients,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 42, pp.

– 671, 1997.

Kopans D. B. “Basic physics and doubts about relationship between

mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk,” Radiology, vol.

, no. 2, pp. 348 – 353, 2008.

Krook P. M. “Mammographic parenchymal patterns as risk indicators for incident

cancer in a screening program: an extended analysis,” AJR Am J Roentgenol, vol. 131,

no. 6, pp. 1031 – 1035, 1978.

Michielsen K. Jacobs J. Lemmens K. Nens J. Zoetelief J. Faulkner K. and Bosmans H.

“RESULTS OF A EUROPEAN DOSE SURVEY FOR MAMMOGRAPHY,” Radiat.

Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 129, no. 1–3, pp. 199–203, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn152

Michielsen K. Jacobs J. and Bosnians H. “Patient Dosimetry for Mammography,” in

AIP Proceeding, 2007, vol. 958, no. 292, pp. 292–293.

Mora P. Chevalier M. Ten J. I. Frenandez Soto J. M. and Vano E. “A SURVEY OF

PATIENT DOSE AND CLINICAL FACTORS IN A FULL-FIELD DIGITAL

MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM,” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 114, no. 1–3, pp. 375–

, 2005.

Smans K. Bosmans H. Xiao M. Carton A. K. and Marchal G. “TOWARDS A

PROPOSITION OF A DIAGNOSTIC ( DOSE ) REFERENCE LEVEL FOR

MAMMOGRAPHIC ACQUISITIONS IN BREAST SCREENING

MEASUREMENTS IN BELGIUM,” Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry, vol. 117, no. 1–3, pp.

–326, 2006.

Threatt B. Norbeck J. Ullman N. Kummer R. and Roselle P. “Association between

mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer,”

Cancer, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2550–2556, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19800515)45:10<2550::AID-CNCR2820451013>3.0.CO;2-M

Wolfe J. N. “Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic

parenchymal pattern,” Cancer, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 2486 – 2492, 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197605)37:5<2486::AID-CNCR2820370542>3.0.CO;2-8

Yaffe M. J. “Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density.,”

Breast Cancer Res., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 209, Jan. 2008.

Published

2014-07-03

How to Cite

Calculation and Analysis of Mean Glandular Dose During a Mammogram. (2014). Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani - Part A, 16(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.17656/jzs.10299