Indications and Neonatal Outcomes of Caesarean Delivery among Women Attending Maternity Teaching Hospital, Sulaimaniyah City, Iraq

Authors

  • Gona Othman Faris Maternal Neonate Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17656/jzs.10890

Keywords:

Indications, neonatal outcomes, emergency caesarean delivery, labour failure, descriptive cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in obstetrics, defined as the birth of a fetus via a surgically created incision in the anterior uterine wall. Over the past two decades, there has been a steady rise in the rate of cesarean section delivery globally. As a result, short-term and long-term maternal and neonatal complications are rising.

 

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the indications and neonatal outcomes of CS among women attending the Maternity Teaching Hospital in Sulaimaniyah city, Iraq.

 

Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional research was performed on 100 women from 12th December 2021 to 12th April 2022.

 

Results: Among participants, 50% were aged >30 years, and three-quarters were housewives. Nearly half of the mothers were multigravida and multipara, in which 64% were emergency, but only 10% underwent CS after delivery induction failure. The utmost common indications of CS were preeclampsia (16%), followed by meconium-stained liquor (12%), non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern (10%), malpresentation, malposition, and previous C/S (8%). In most newborn babies, Apgar score level was seven and <7 minutes.

 

Conclusions: Most CS were emergency and performed for babies at full and post-term. NICU admission was associated with a low Apgar score, respiratory distress syndrome and all indications of CS.

References

Lyell D.J., Power M., Murtough K., Ness A., Anderson B., Erickson K. & Schulkin J. (2016). Surgical techniques at cesarean delivery: a US survey. The Surgery Journal. 2(04), e119-e125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594247

Torloni M.R., Betran A.P., Souza J.P., Widmer M., Allen T., Gulmezoglu M. & Merialdi M. (2011). Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PloS One. 6(1), e14566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014566

Lucas D., Yentis S., Kinsella S., Holdcroft A., May A.E., Wee M. & Robinson P.N. (2000). Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 93(7), 346-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680009300703

Betran A.P., Torloni M.R., Zhang J.J., Gulmezoglu A.M., Aleem H.A., Althabe F., Bergholt T., De Bernis L., Carroli G., Deneux‐Tharaux C. & Devlieger R. (2016). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 123(5), 667-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526

Mendoza-Sassi R.A., Cesar J.A., Silva P.Rd., Denardin G. & Rodrigues M.M. (2010). Risk factors for cesarean section by category of health service. Revista de saúde pública. 44, 80-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102010000100009

Faisal-Cury A., Menezes P.R., Quayle J., Santiago K., & Matijasevich A. (2017). The relationship between indicators of socioeconomic status and cesarean section in public hospitals. Revista de saude publica. 51(14), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006134

Betran A.P., Ye J., Moller A.B., Zhang J., Gulmezoglu A.M., & Torloni M.R. (2016). The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS One. 11(2), e0148343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343

Batieha A., Al-Daradkah S., Khader Y., Basha A., Sabet F., Athamneh T.Z. & Sheyyab M. (2017). Cesarean section: incidence, causes, associated factors and outcomes: a national prospective study from Jordan. Gynecology and Obstetrics Case Report. 3(3), 55-65.

Khan A., Ghani T., Rahim A. & Rahman M. (2014). Changing trends in incidence and indications of caesarean section. Mymensingh Medical Journal. 23(1), 52-55.

Kalisa R., Rulisa S., van Roosmalen J. & van den Akker T. (2017). Maternal and perinatal outcome after previous caesarean section in rural Rwanda. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 17(1), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1467-5

Nagy S. & Papp Z. (2021). Global approach of the cesarean section rates. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 49(1), 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0463

Mengesha M.B., Adhanu H.H., Weldegeorges D.A., Assefa, N.E., Werid, W.M., Weldemariam, M.G., Welay, F.T., Hidru, H.D. & Gebru, T.T. (2019). Maternal and fetal outcomes of cesarean delivery and factors associated with its unfavorable management outcomes; in Ayder Specialized Comprehensive Hospital, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2017. BMC Research Notes. 12(1), 1-6.

Ayele A.D., Kassa B.G., Mihretie G.N. & Beyene F.Y. (2020). Decision to Delivery Interval, Fetal Outcomes and Its Factors Among Emergency Caesarean Section Deliveries at South Gondar Zone Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Women's Health. 13, 395-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S295348

Elias S., Wolde Z., Tantu T., Gunta M. & Zewudu D. (2022). Determinants of early neonatal outcomes after emergency cesarean delivery at Hawassa University comprehensive specialized hospital, Hawassa, Ethiopia. Plos One. 17(3), e0263837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263837

Khasawneh W., Obeidat N., Yusef D. & Alsulaiman J.W. (2020). The impact of cesarean section on neonatal outcomes at a university-based tertiary hospital in Jordan. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 20(1), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03027-2

Choudhary B., Choudhary Y., Pakhare A.P., Mahto D. & Chaturvedula L. (2017). Early neonatal outcome in caesarean section: A developing country perspective. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics. 27(1), e7948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.7948

Gedefaw G., Demis A., Alemnew B., Wondmieneh A., Getie A. & Waltengus F. (2020). Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Safety in Surgery. 14(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-020-00236-8

Khemworapong K., Sompagdee N. & Boriboonhirunsarn D. (2018). Decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Obstetrics and Gynecology Science. 61(1), 48-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.48

Agbozo F., Abubakari A. & Jahn A. (2019). Indication and predictors for caesarean sections in Ghana and the birth outcomes. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 234, e5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.159

Thomas J., Olukade T.O., Naz A., Salama H., Al-Qubaisi M., Al Rifai H. & Al-Obaidly S. (2021). The neonatal respiratory morbidity associated with early term caesarean section–an emerging pandemic. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 49(7), 767-772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0402

Harrison M.S., Pasha O., Saleem S., Ali S., Chomba E., Carlo W.A., Garces A.L., Krebs N.F., Hambidge K.M., Goudar S.S. & Kodkany B. (2017). A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low‐and middle‐income countries. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 96(4), 410-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13098

Published

2023-06-20

How to Cite

Indications and Neonatal Outcomes of Caesarean Delivery among Women Attending Maternity Teaching Hospital, Sulaimaniyah City, Iraq. (2023). Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani - Part A, 25(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.17656/jzs.10890